<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Ruby, Refactoring and Lean Manufacturing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/</link>
	<description>letting the problem solve itself</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tetsuo</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Tetsuo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Maybe because it's harder to do refactoring tools for dynamic typed languages, compared to static typed ones?

http://c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki?DynamicTypesEaseRefactoring</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe because it&#8217;s harder to do refactoring tools for dynamic typed languages, compared to static typed ones?</p>
<p><a href="http://c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki?DynamicTypesEaseRefactoring" rel="nofollow">http://c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki?DynamicTypesEaseRefactoring</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ade</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Carlos,
Some of us have had refactoring support in Python for years. Take a look at: http://bicyclerepair.sourceforge.net/
Admittedly there hasn't been a release for some time but I and many people in python land have easy access to: extract method, extract function, extract local variable, inline local variable. BRM does support other refactorings but those 4 are the ones I hooked up to my current favourite python text editor: Pype ( http://pype.sourceforge.net/ ).

There's also a pretty decent refactoring browser available for Ruby: http://www.kmc.gr.jp/proj/rrb/index-en.html

I think the really interesting question is why there's so little interest in improving the existing refactoring tools for languages like Python and Ruby. Why is it no-one seems interested in doing the hard work of putting together a development environment as polished as Intellij? People are too busy following the herd and building yet another web application framework rather than taking on a research-level challenge like refactoring.

--ade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos,<br />
Some of us have had refactoring support in Python for years. Take a look at: <a href="http://bicyclerepair.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://bicyclerepair.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
Admittedly there hasn&#8217;t been a release for some time but I and many people in python land have easy access to: extract method, extract function, extract local variable, inline local variable. BRM does support other refactorings but those 4 are the ones I hooked up to my current favourite python text editor: Pype ( <a href="http://pype.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://pype.sourceforge.net/</a> ).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a pretty decent refactoring browser available for Ruby: <a href="http://www.kmc.gr.jp/proj/rrb/index-en.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kmc.gr.jp/proj/rrb/index-en.html</a></p>
<p>I think the really interesting question is why there&#8217;s so little interest in improving the existing refactoring tools for languages like Python and Ruby. Why is it no-one seems interested in doing the hard work of putting together a development environment as polished as Intellij? People are too busy following the herd and building yet another web application framework rather than taking on a research-level challenge like refactoring.</p>
<p>&#8211;ade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Silveira</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Silveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2005/12/12/on-ruby-refactoring-and-lean-manufacturing/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hi, I think you'll have fun reading this:

http://www.slowleadership.org/2005/12/hurry-up-and-wait.html

I think waiting is the biggest waste in software development. And worse, time and brainpower are not saved: they are consumed in unproductive, sometimes unimportant tasks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I think you&#8217;ll have fun reading this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slowleadership.org/2005/12/hurry-up-and-wait.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.slowleadership.org/2005/12/hurry-up-and-wait.html</a></p>
<p>I think waiting is the biggest waste in software development. And worse, time and brainpower are not saved: they are consumed in unproductive, sometimes unimportant tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.947 seconds -->
