<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java feature request: static reflection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/</link>
	<description>letting the problem solve itself</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Pires Plentz : Static reflection</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-17039</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Pires Plentz : Static reflection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-17039</guid>
		<description>[...] O Villela recÃ©m postou no seu blog, um pequeno recado pro pessoal do JCP, que espero que seja lido, re-lido e repassado atÃ© que alguÃ©m lÃ¡ da nave-mÃ£e veja: static reflection. A idÃ©ia seria prover alguma forma de reflexÃ£o estaticamente, algo do tipo: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O Villela recÃ©m postou no seu blog, um pequeno recado pro pessoal do JCP, que espero que seja lido, re-lido e repassado atÃ© que alguÃ©m lÃ¡ da nave-mÃ£e veja: static reflection. A idÃ©ia seria prover alguma forma de reflexÃ£o estaticamente, algo do tipo: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Meyer&#8217;s WebLog &#187; Static reflection request</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-12457</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Meyer&#8217;s WebLog &#187; Static reflection request</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-12457</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carlos Villela wrote about a new feature request for Java’s reflection API on his blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-12432</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-12432</guid>
		<description>I think you must submit this request. I don&#039;t even know, why sun still use isA?
[trackback] http://fmeyer.org/typo/public/articles/2006/09/26/static-reflection-request</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you must submit this request. I don&#8217;t even know, why sun still use isA?<br />
[trackback] <a href="http://fmeyer.org/typo/public/articles/2006/09/26/static-reflection-request" rel="nofollow">http://fmeyer.org/typo/public/articles/2006/09/26/static-reflection-request</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-12429</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-12429</guid>
		<description>Have a look at jMock 2: a literate programming style *and* refactoring friendly: http://cvs.jmock.codehaus.org/browse/jmock/jmock2/test/org/jmock/test/acceptance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at jMock 2: a literate programming style *and* refactoring friendly: <a href="http://cvs.jmock.codehaus.org/browse/jmock/jmock2/test/org/jmock/test/acceptance" rel="nofollow">http://cvs.jmock.codehaus.org/browse/jmock/jmock2/test/org/jmock/test/acceptance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego Pires Plentz &#187; Static reflection</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-12428</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego Pires Plentz &#187; Static reflection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-12428</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O Villela recém postou no seu blog, um pequeno recado pro pessoal do JCP, que espero que seja lido, re-lido e repassado até que alguém lá da nave-mãe veja: static reflection. A idéia seria prover alguma forma de reflexão estaticamente, algo do tipo: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Villela</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-12424</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Villela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-12424</guid>
		<description>Yeah, EasyMock has a somewhat cleaner syntax, which I currently prefer over JMock&#039;s literate programming style, but that still leaves the configuration for Spring and many other frameworks behind.

I like the idea of thisMethod, but can&#039;t think of any uses for it off the top of my head right now. What do you have in mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, EasyMock has a somewhat cleaner syntax, which I currently prefer over JMock&#8217;s literate programming style, but that still leaves the configuration for Spring and many other frameworks behind.</p>
<p>I like the idea of thisMethod, but can&#8217;t think of any uses for it off the top of my head right now. What do you have in mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-12423</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lixo.org/archives/2006/09/25/java-feature-request-static-reflection/#comment-12423</guid>
		<description>Or you could use EasyMock (which has an even cleaner syntax). Being able to reference Method objects more easily would be nice though. Supporting a notion of &quot;thisMethod&quot; would be a good start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could use EasyMock (which has an even cleaner syntax). Being able to reference Method objects more easily would be nice though. Supporting a notion of &#8220;thisMethod&#8221; would be a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.829 seconds -->

